Ban homework? Not so fast.

calvin

The cry to ban homework is one which has been around for a while. Educators like Alfie Khon have been campaigning for it for years, echoing what students have been saying forever. The President of France, Francoise Hollande, recently announced his intentions to do this in primary and middle schools, stressing the inequalities which homework merely emphasises. Many may cheer, many may rejoice but I’m not totally convinced. In an era where learning is more and more the social currency in which we expect our children’s future’s to be negotiated, it would appear that banning homework seems mental.

Let’s be honest. Homework is something which nobody enjoys. Kids hate it eating up their free time. Teachers generally hate marking it. Parents find it an endless source of stress at home. ‘Twas ever thus though. I left school in 1984 and things don’t appear to have changed much. Rarely was it linked to anything worthwhile. Rarely was it connected to learning above merely doing. Homework was issued as a matter of school policy rather than educational necessity. Under those circumstances is it any wonder that homework has such a bad reputation.

However, before you come to the conclusion that I’m a yoghurt knitting leftie – I may well be but not in terms of homework – it is not learning at home I object to. It is this imposition of ‘work at home’ which creates so many problems. That it enhances and increases inequality of opportunity is difficult to argue against. Those with warm, comfortable homes, modern computers, nice desks and supportive parents are already at an advantage. For some kids, even getting to school is tribute to their tenacity and perseverance. Adding homework to the list of difficulties at home is not only self-defeating but cruel.

But we must not inhibit learning by banning it. Learning at home must be encouraged. I recently, very publicly, shared the best piece of homework I have ever received. Did the student learn from this experience? I’ll let you decide. What I would say is that the learning experiences of both of us have been enhanced by the process. I am very aware that not every student would even have had the tools to create something like this, never mind the will or the talent, but to ban homework seems to be cutting our noses off to spite our faces.

It is not the word ‘homework’ which I object to but the ‘banning’ of it. We could be setting a very dangerous precedent if we do so, inadvertently placing learning way down the list of priorities. So here’s the thing. Let’s stop calling it homework; it’s only a label. Let’s start talking about learning at home. I believe that learning at home needs to be encouraged. We know the students who will do it and do it well and we know the ones who won’t, often for very good reasons. But banning won’t help anyone. Encourage it but don’t punish those who don’t do it. It may well be the last things on their minds when they’re at home.

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/12/17/121217taco_talk_menand

http://www.delicious.com/kennypieper/homework

8 thoughts on “Ban homework? Not so fast.

  1. My kids learn at home all the time – it is only way to learn a musical instrument – it is pretty much the same with learning to write or count or lots of other skills practice makes perfect – but it needs to be fun.

    • Thanks Joe,
      Totally agree. I’ve said before both at Teachmeet and on the blog that we are very fond of labeling in education, and when we label something it is very easy to dismiss it as a ‘thing’. The term ‘Homework’ gets in the way of all of that great learning you talk about. Needs to change. We need to change.

  2. I’m always interested in the extremes: Either assign homework [allt he time] or don’t.

    Homework doesn’t have to be like that. Good homework begins with the teacher knowing why he/she is assigning it.
    – I assign a 20-minute math review sheet to reinforce the day’s lesson. The homework is never new to students. I glance at it each morning for the purposes of seeing who needs additional small-group instruction.
    – I want students to demonstrate they are developing a reading life and a writing life. They can demonstrate that any way they’d like.

    The problem comes when teachers believe that homework will be a magic bullet for learning – or if teachers believe students will learn something at home that they will not learn at school.

    A little homework won’t kill students – as long as the homework is meant as review and is limited in terms of time and is for the purposes of formative rather than summative [read: averaging or percentages] assessments.

    • Thanks Janet,
      I suppose my concern comes from those who really don’t have the same opportunities to complete homework which can be seen as an unnecessary imposition on their already troubled home lives. I worry that we teachers don’t take that into consideration often enough and try to treat all students equally with homework. Which they most certainly aren’t.

    • Thanks for your comment. I think the point of my post was that it should not be compulsory. Sorry you think a change of term is a sham. I was merely echoing Claxton’s claim that perhaps talking about ‘learning’ rather than ‘Working’ is more effective.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s